<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Radical Iran Flexes Military Muscle at Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danareport.com/2010/01/04/radical-iran-flexes-military-muscle-at-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danareport.com/2010/01/04/radical-iran-flexes-military-muscle-at-obama/</link>
	<description>Getting It Right.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:29:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://danareport.com/2010/01/04/radical-iran-flexes-military-muscle-at-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-12007</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 01:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danareport.com/?p=7139#comment-12007</guid>
		<description>Julia, a radical regime that publicly seeks weapons-grade uranium and repeatedly tests long range missiles while provoking the likes of Israel and the United States into a nuclear showdown is clearly not looking for more efficient electricity.  One would be have to be a complete moron, much like President Peanut Jimmy Carter or President Obama, to honestly think these wackos do not wish to destroy us the first chance they get.  Turning a blind eye to radical islamists who promise your demise on a daily basis will not keep you alive and is clearly a failing approach to national security.  I suggest you get some common sense before you comment again and embarrass yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Julia, a radical regime that publicly seeks weapons-grade uranium and repeatedly tests long range missiles while provoking the likes of Israel and the United States into a nuclear showdown is clearly not looking for more efficient electricity.  One would be have to be a complete moron, much like President Peanut Jimmy Carter or President Obama, to honestly think these wackos do not wish to destroy us the first chance they get.  Turning a blind eye to radical islamists who promise your demise on a daily basis will not keep you alive and is clearly a failing approach to national security.  I suggest you get some common sense before you comment again and embarrass yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan</title>
		<link>http://danareport.com/2010/01/04/radical-iran-flexes-military-muscle-at-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-11913</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 07:42:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danareport.com/?p=7139#comment-11913</guid>
		<description>I thought of seriously responding. Then I decided not to because, Julia, you&#039;re a nut
job. Thanks for stopping by!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought of seriously responding. Then I decided not to because, Julia, you&#8217;re a nut<br />
job. Thanks for stopping by!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia</title>
		<link>http://danareport.com/2010/01/04/radical-iran-flexes-military-muscle-at-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-11910</link>
		<dc:creator>Julia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 06:53:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://danareport.com/?p=7139#comment-11910</guid>
		<description>Iran is not building nuclear weapons. No one has found any evidence of this. And even so, there is plenty of reason as to why Iran would want to: after all two of their neighbors (Iraq and Afghanistan) are under foreign occupation and another (Pakistan) is highly unstable.

To all of the people advocating for a &quot;free Iran&quot;: do you think that the Iranian people will really be more &quot;free&quot; under a pro-western president (or &quot;dictator&quot; as you may say) like Mousavi rather than a pro-Iranian president like Ahmadinejad? I don&#039;t support states or politicians as I feel that change can only come from the people, but come on! Mousavi&#039;s record is far WORSE than Ahmadinejad&#039;s in every aspect.

Bottom line: the USA needs to leave Iran alone. Hillary Clinton is supposedly having some meeting to discuss Iran&#039;s nuclear program and of course she invites several world leaders but no Iranian leaders. Iran is being unfairly bullied and people need to leave it alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Iran is not building nuclear weapons. No one has found any evidence of this. And even so, there is plenty of reason as to why Iran would want to: after all two of their neighbors (Iraq and Afghanistan) are under foreign occupation and another (Pakistan) is highly unstable.</p>
<p>To all of the people advocating for a &#8220;free Iran&#8221;: do you think that the Iranian people will really be more &#8220;free&#8221; under a pro-western president (or &#8220;dictator&#8221; as you may say) like Mousavi rather than a pro-Iranian president like Ahmadinejad? I don&#8217;t support states or politicians as I feel that change can only come from the people, but come on! Mousavi&#8217;s record is far WORSE than Ahmadinejad&#8217;s in every aspect.</p>
<p>Bottom line: the USA needs to leave Iran alone. Hillary Clinton is supposedly having some meeting to discuss Iran&#8217;s nuclear program and of course she invites several world leaders but no Iranian leaders. Iran is being unfairly bullied and people need to leave it alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
